According to @EricBalchunas, active ETFs now outnumber passive ETFs by fund count, while active strategies hold roughly 10% of total ETF assets and are growing quickly (source: Eric Balchunas on X, Oct 14, 2025). For traders, this shift in product mix highlights that new launches and flows may increasingly favor active vehicles even as passive AUM dominance persists, affecting liquidity dispersion and pricing across segments (source: Eric Balchunas on X, Oct 14, 2025). In crypto specifically, most U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs such as IBIT and FBTC are passively managed index trackers per their SEC prospectuses, making the broader active-ETF growth an important backdrop when assessing future crypto ETF structures, fees, and tracking approaches (source: SEC prospectuses for iShares Bitcoin Trust and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund, Jan 2024). Monitor the active-to-passive ETF launch ratio and net inflows as leading indicators for potential demand shifts that could influence digital-asset exposure via ETFs (source: Eric Balchunas on X, Oct 14, 2025).

According to Eric Balchunas, active ETFs have attracted 40% of net flows in 2025 despite comprising just 10% of total ETF assets. Additionally, nearly 90% of all new ETF launches this year are active, enabling active ETFs to surpass passive ETFs in terms of total launches. This significant capital inflow and surge in active ETF launches suggest a shift in investor preference toward active strategies, which could impact liquidity and volatility in related sectors, including cryptocurrency-linked ETFs. Traders should monitor this trend, as increased active management may lead to more dynamic portfolio adjustments and could influence market correlations with crypto assets (Source: Eric Balchunas on Twitter, June 12, 2025).